Incentives and More: Four Aspects that Every Innovation in Scholarly Communication Needs To Consider - Answer to "Kingsley/Kennan: Open access: The whipping Boy for Problems in Scholarly publishing"
نویسندگان
چکیده
With this paper, we hope to foster debate about the place of open access (OA) in scholarly publishing. After providing a background to OA’s development and current state, we examine some of the accusations leveled against it: that OA publishers are predatory, that OA is too expensive, and that self-depositing papers in OA repositories will bring about the end of scholarly publishing. After contextualizing each accusation, we show that they arise from problems with not only access, open or otherwise, but also the scholarly publishing system more broadly. Accordingly, we instead propose the discussions we believe the scholarly community should be having about scholarly publishing to take advantage of social and technological innovations and move it into the 21st century.
منابع مشابه
Open Access: The Whipping Boy for Problems in Scholarly Communication - A Response to the Rebuttals
In this paper, we respond to five rebuttals to Kingsley and Kennan (2015). Four researchers in the information systems field and a university library director of research infrastructure provided these rebuttals. Almost without exception, the rebuttals from the information systems researchers take an analytical approach to the question of scholarly communication in their field. However, in under...
متن کاملRejoinder to Open Access: The Whipping Boy for Problems in Scholarly Publishing
This is a commentary as part of the debate on Open Access.
متن کاملA Comment on Open Access: the Whipping Boy for Problems in Scholarly Publishing
This is a commentary as part of the debate on Open Access. Editor’s Note: The paper was handled by the Department Editor for Debates. 379 A Comment on Open Access: the Whipping Boy for Problems in Scholarly Publishing Volume 34 Paper 19 In their paper, Kingsley and Kennan (2015) provide a spirited, but not entirely convincing, defense of the open access process/movement/system. In this rejoinde...
متن کاملIdentifying Credibility Criteria in Scholarly Communication (Reading and Citing) form the Standpoints of Faculty Members of Kharazmi University
Background and Aim: In effect, every scientific endeavor consisted of scientific communication and scientists’ involvement in particular field of study; and scientific board members as the most outstanding elements play a key role in scientific productions. Therefore, a constructive scientific communication requires obtaining credible and valid information. In so doing, this study tries to inve...
متن کاملGuidelines for selecting journals that avoid fraudulent practices in scholarly publishing
In recent years, scholarly publishing has been faced with many distractive phenomena. Generally, most researchers are unaware of fraudulent practices now common to scholarly publishing and are at risk of becoming a victim of them. Editors also need to have sufficient knowledge about these practices. There are papers that try to increase awareness of authors about fraud in scholarly publishing, ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- CAIS
دوره 37 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015